ADAP Advocacy has published a two-part infographic series examining the relationship between hospital CEO compensation and the 340B Drug Pricing Program. The materials, released as part of the organization's 340B Project, highlight what the advocacy group describes as excessive executive compensation packages funded through a program originally designed to assist low-income patients. The first infographic focuses on the growing disparity between CEO pay and frontline nurse compensation, emphasizing that the 340B Drug Pricing Program was specifically created to help poor patients access essential healthcare services. According to the advocacy group, despite the program's expansion to $66 billion in scale, manufacturer rebates intended for patient care are being diverted to fund what they characterize as excessive compensation for hospital executives.
The second infographic documents how CEO compensation has increased exponentially following hospitals' eligibility to participate in the 340B Program. ADAP Advocacy contends that the program was never intended to enrich healthcare executives but rather to support vulnerable patient populations. The organization's national advocacy campaign questions whether the 340B Drug Pricing Program has become 'too big to fail,' drawing parallels to financial institutions during the 2008 economic crisis. Both infographics are available for download through ADAP Advocacy's publications portal at https://www.adapadvocacy.org/publications.html#i. The materials complement the organization's recently released commercial and form part of their broader campaign to increase transparency and accountability within the 340B Program.
The advocacy group maintains that the program's original mission of serving low-income patients is being compromised by financial practices that prioritize executive enrichment over patient care. The release of these infographics comes amid ongoing national debate about healthcare costs and executive compensation in the nonprofit hospital sector. ADAP Advocacy's analysis suggests a direct correlation between hospital participation in the 340B Program and dramatic increases in CEO compensation, raising questions about whether the program is achieving its intended purpose of expanding access to care for vulnerable populations. The organization's findings challenge current implementations of the 340B Program and call for greater scrutiny of how program funds are allocated within participating healthcare institutions.
